Monday, February 6, 2012

A Shakespearean Director's take on a Classic Marvel Superhero


 I decided to write the first review on Thor (2011) because all last week my roommate kept reciting, “Thor the God of Thunder was riding on a filly, ‘I’m Thor’ he cried, his horse replied, ‘So get a thaddle thilly.’” Therefore the only plausible way to deal with my desire to rewatch Thor was to use it in an assignment. Basically my roommate and I are very close.

She (Hilary) and I have been roommates for two years. We were thrown together as timid freshman testing out the waters of college when we realized the new environment would be somewhat survivable because we are both awesome people. Hilary is so awesome that I couldn’t bare the thought of not rooming with her the upcoming year. So here are; two sophomores, delving deeper into our respective majors (her Geosciences and Education and myself Radio/TV and Cinema Studies).

I have to admit I love my majors because it is fun to watch movies and intently analyze them along with putting together and editing my own creations. At the bottom of it all I just really like to watch TV and movies and talk about them. I’m kinda like Abed from the TV show Community. I find these things interesting to break down and study. There is always so much meaning and detail, which is exactly what I’m going to be exploring in this blog.

Thor is an exquisitely stunning film directed by Kenneth Branagh that masterfully blends a Shakespearean sense of dramatic storytelling with the modern day appeal for action.

For those of you who managed to miss the fourth installment in Marvel’s Avenger series, the film is about the god Thor who is as powerful as he is arrogant. Because of this arrogance, his father casts him out of their land, Asgard, to Earth where he is only as strong as the next man. Through Thor’s banishment he must learn what it means to be a God and all that he is responsible for. However, his banishment gets tricky when his little brother Loki decides he is going to take over the realm. Thor must stop his brother from destroying all the peace their father created while King, while stuck on Earth in order to keep all the realms safe.

Let’s talk about the visual effects for a moment. They are breathtaking, absolutely breathtaking. A team of visual artists worked very hard to make this film as beautiful as it is entertaining. Every color is magnified; in one particular scene when Thor, Loki, and his friends enter the Jotunnheim (where the Frost Giants are), the entire realm is gray and black, with some white because of the snow. Everything is sharpened as to really emphasize the coldness of the realm. But what is really striking is Thor’s red cape contrasted with the gray, cold background. It is so vibrant that it almost makes the entire setting black and white. It is very reminiscent of Spielberg’s Schindler’s List. The entire film is black and white except for two parts; the beginning in which the viewer sees the color of the flame of the candle being lit and then again when the main character is watching a little girl walking through the streets while apartments are being raided by the Nazi’s. Everything around them is black and white, except for her, in her bright red coat. We follow the girl because of this distinction and are told there is something different about her because of her coat. 

Also really highlighted in this scene is the Frost Giant’s piercing red eyes. Red is a very significant color throughout this film since the color exemplifies power, which is very dominant theme in Thor. For the most part though, the film uses special effects only when the audience is viewing the where the Gods dwell, such as the Jotunnheim and Asgard. When the film changes its setting to Earth, there are no special effects and everything looks very realistic. We are supposed to view the realms as a fantastical and mythical place; which is exactly what the stunning graphics achieve.

The brothers, Thor and Loki, have a very specific color scheme in this epic. Thor's colors are red, blue, and silver while Loki's colors are green, bronze, and black. These colors are incorporated into their princely garb while in Asgard and the two also are dressed in their respective colors when on Earth, although their costumes are not as fantastical. Thor is wearing blue jeans, a navy blue t-shirt, and a red plaid flannel shirt. Loki, during his brief visit to Earth, is wearing a dark green overcoat, a green and bronze scarf, and a deep green tie. Clearly the costuming in this movie is very purposeful and really wants to draw our attention to the contrast in dress and the contrast in characteristics between the two feuding brothers. Another interesting point with costuming are the helmets Thor, his father (Odin, the King), and Loki wear. The color of Odin's helmet is gold, Thor's is silver, and Loki's is bronze. This subtly highlights the importance and rank within the family and as always, Loki comes last. 

The reason Loki becomes so jealous and vengeful is because he always had a sneaking suspicion that he was not really Odin’s son and Odin never truly loved him. That kind of thought can really do a number on a child’s head. Thor was always the favorite, he was the one who would become king someday, even though Loki believed he would make a terrible king; and he would. Thor is too rash and violent. He thinks with his heart opposed to Loki who would actually make a decent ruler because he think with his brain. Loki does find out the reason his father never loved him as much and it is because he is adopted, and not only that, Loki is actually a Frost Giant Odin saved when he made peace so long ago. So there is a lot of underlying tension.

Now, onto the interesting choice in director. If one goes onto Imdb and looks at the other films Branagh has directed, one would notice that for the most part, the films are adaptations of Shakespeare’s greatest works. Now it might be odd that a classic Shakespearean director be chosen to director a superhero movie, but a close look at the plot of Thor would suggest otherwise. The story of Thor is actually very Shakespearean. The story of Thor is actually very Shakespearean considering the story is about two brothers struggling to succeed their father as king. One brother, Thor, is a spoiled, arrogant person who does not know the first thing about ruling a kingdom but believes he does on the basis he grew up as a prince. Compared to Loki who really just wants his father's love and attention therefore he decides to try to start a war and in process causes his father to go in to a deep sleep and just basically tries to ruin everything because his father never loved him enough. The story is really a great epic. The costuming, the staging, and the lighting all really add the dramatic idea that Thor could be a Shakespearean play.


All in all, the movie is arguably the most enjoyable out of all the Avenger's films due to its stunning visuals, the choice to use a director skilled in Shakespeare, and all of the action laid in.

4 comments:

  1. Hailey, I find it interesting that you chose a blockbuster like Thor to analyze in your first post, because such films are often dismissed as shallow and trite, and as a result are glossed over by in-depth analysis. I believe that all movies, no matter what their genre or target audience, are worthy of analysis and debate. I agree with you that films are fun to “break down and study.” That being said, you have taken a pair of analytical tweezers to Thor and have extracted some fascinating points that would probably escape the common audience’s notice.

    I’ve seen Thor as well, so perhaps this is the beginning of an inter-blog (is that even a term?) debate. First, we have your point about the characters’ costumes: one of the most striking things about Loki’s garb is the green color scheme. Since you mentioned that Thor’s brilliant red cape symbolizes his power and passion, I think that Loki’s green reflects his envy of Thor; after all, green is the color of jealousy. Also, green is also associated with money, which is interesting in this context because Loki sought to profit from his treachery.

    There also seems to be a city dweller vs. rural dweller dichotomy in connection to Loki’s green motif: Asgard is presented as a colorful, civilized bastion of order and justice, while Jotuunheim is shown as a cold, inhospitable wasteland inhabited by war-mongering beings. Jotuunheim is considered “The Other” when compared to Asgard, just as Loki is “The Other” when contrasted with Thor. In a roundabout way, this idea connects with the green motif that I mentioned earlier: green is symbolic of nature, which is the opposite of the city, and so Loki’s green costume links him to his non-Asgardian origins.

    What do you think, Hailey? What do you think the filmmakers are trying to say with this nature vs. civilization dynamic?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow. I think you really brought up a really interesting idea that I actually agree with and support. I do think there is a distinct difference between the two realms and there is an underlying sense that cities are better than rural areas. Also I do think that Loki's color is green because of the envy he holds for Thor and his power but at the same time it is there to connect him with his birthplace.

    I have to say that I appreciate your comments and further analysis that I would have never relaized otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hailee, I really like your approach with comparing "Thor" with the works of Shakespeare. I haven't watched the film since I saw it in theaters over the Summer; but when I saw that Kenneth Branagh was directing it, I was curious to see what Shakespearean touch he would bring to this Marvel charcter, since he has dabbled significantly in the bard's work

    Although we all knew that "Thor" wasn't going to be a tragic story, it was still interesting to see that it had that kind of set-up, with the protagonist exhibiting a great amount of hubris, a tragic flaw, which causes him to be banished from his world until he can learn to control himself. I loved the family dynamics within the film, especially the sibling rivalry between Thor and Loki. It carried an epic feel to it with two other-worldly and powerful characters who both had dislikable qualities: Thor with his over sense of pride and Loki with his jealousy of Thor.

    It was also interesting to think that there are stories that have been passed down for ages, and that Stan Lee took this Norse god and placed him in his comic-book universe for other generations to enjoy. The film also did a terrific job with introducing Thor and his world, and not just hurrying into the storyline on Earth.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I guess I'd better put in my two cents: I'm not the biggest fan of Thor; in fact, I'm not the biggest fan of any of the marvel films (save for the original Iron Man, which is by far the best thing Marvel Studios has put out). I profess to having somewhat of an ignorance when it comes to the Marvel universe, though I don't believe that makes my opinions any less valid.

    Adaptations are an extremely iffy thing for directors to sort out--and one has to ask: Does a faithful adaptation automatically make for a good movie? The answer should be simple enough: if a movie retains all of the subject matter of its source material, then it's a successful adaption--right? Well, it's a bit complicated than that. For a proper adaption, there needs to be an understanding of not only the source material, but the limitations of the film medium itself.

    So getting back to the topic at hand, my problem with Thor, as well as my problem with the other Marvel films post-Iron Man, is that they're perfectly fine adaptations, but mediocre films. They don't necessarily add anything to the fiction, choosing to just rely on regurgitating material from the comic-books to appease the fans. It's why I prefer Christopher Nolan's approach to the Batman films: he's clearly being inspired by various elements of the Batman comic, however, he's making the characters with his own interpretation, and working on making a good film first and a good comic-book film second.

    I will say in Thor's case that it is one of the better releases from Marvel Studios; you're absolutely right in saying that Kenneth Branagh's Shakespearean background--I do love his adaptation of Othello--helps the film tremendously, as the Asgard sections of the film evoke an epic nature not seen in any other Avenger film. It’s just that, once Thor is banished from his realm to the confines of Earth, the film seems to lose any type of momentum it had as it crawls to a very bland ending.

    ReplyDelete