So
after a couple days of digesting a movie a ginormous as The
Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, I now feel confident enough to to justly
review the movie.
Peter
Jackson's retelling of the J.R.R. Tolkien's The Hobbit was definitely
unexpected. Let's start with the good. The cinematography was absolutely
gorgeous. Even in the regular frame rate, the picture was stunningly clear.
The saturation was also a plus. It was a very pretty film to watch.
Secondly, I love Martin Freeman. He IS Bilbo Baggins, right down to the core.
His portrayal of the hobbit was just perfect. I truly believed he was Bilbo.
The cast in general was just full of superb acting, though that's what you get
when you stock your cast full of actors from the BBC. Ian McKellen was
excellent as Gandalf as always. The dwarves were led by the talented Richard
Armitage who played Thorin. The cast also included James Nesbitt as Bofur,
Aidan Turner as Kili, and Stephen Hunter as Bombur.
So
the acting was very good and the film was visually very appealing. The most
crucial part of any film is the story. The story was not bad. It definitely
felt like Tolkien since there was a lot of attention to detail but there were
some elements that I just did not like. I appreciated the way Jackson opened up
with Old Bilbo narrating the story and eventually revealing the story is being
told to Frodo. I did not like Frodo's cameo. It felt very forced and like it
was only there to appeal to the members in the audience who loved Frodo in The
Lord of the Rings. I understood he was trying to reveal that Bilbo was
writing his story on the day of his 111th birthday, the same day he leaves and
Frodo's adventure begins, but something about it just did not feel right.
I
also was not a fan of the Pale Orc having a bigger story arc in the movie then
he did in the book. It seemed as though Jackson was trying to create more
action and tension than there was in the first part of The
Hobbit because he wanted it to be more action-y. This, took away from
the feeling of a true Lord of the Rings feel. There did not seem to be as
large of an emphasis on plot because when there was actual plot it moved very
quickly. However, I did love that Jackson decided to expand Radagast's
(Slyvester McCoy) story farther than what we read in the book. His storyline
helped really enhance the plot and it was interesting to see another wizard
beside Gandalf and Saruman, especially another good wizard.
The
film was good but not great and thinking about it, I would say it is like The
Two Towers for me considering that movie is really good but it is not
my favorite (or I think) the best out of the trilogy.
I LOVED the Radagast additions. Very cool character!
ReplyDeleteExactly! Even though he wasn't that big of a character in the book, I'm glad they gave him a part in the movie.
ReplyDelete